I have an account on Linked In where I belong to a few groups focused  on visual art and careers in the arts.  One of the moderators posed a  question about free speech and profanity.  There is a whole subset of  discussions on that alone but he was wondering with regard to that  particular group should comments be deleted for certain vocabulary  choices participants make when commenting on the board.  Frankly, I fail  to see what makes "bad" words inappropriate in a professional context,  especially in the arts when you think about all the forms and  expressions of artists we are supposed to be open to.  
Coincidentally,  this conversation started almost the same time that the issue came up  on the docent blog on which I contribute as a member of the docent  staff. I responded on Linked In with this:
"Frankly if one's vocabulary choices are appropriate to the content of what he/she expresses then there is no bad language.
What's offensive is to ignore this basic rule:  Say what you mean and  mean what you say.  You know, capturing the intensity of an emotion or  thought might be best summarized with what some people call profanity.   But they're just words and at some point you have to say what you mean.   And at some point, people choose to be offended by inconsequential  things.
It's not merely a defense of the crude on my part.  In getting to some  of my career goals I will likely work with a very broad spectrum of "the  public."  Some of those persons will likely be from disenfranchised  communities or other challenged circumstances.  I should ignore the  validity of their experiences and perspectives because they don't speak  eloquently?  That's ridiculous.  How can I ever want to take a proactive  role in using art as a social outreach tool if I deny others voice  simply for having their own means of using that voice?
What lowers the level of discourse is to dismiss critical content  because you think words are bad.  Worse, people oft employ the bad words  defense as a means to deflect attention away from the content because  the content makes them uncomfortable.  They would like to avoid this  discomfort so they blame others for speaking out of turn as a means to  kill the conversation.  That undermines real discourse and is a source  of real offense.
If we're on this board, participating in this discussion then we work in  or around the arts and are concerned with all forms of expression.   It's a disservice to enact this kind of censorship for petty reasons  when really some of us should be more proactive in questioning what it  is that truly makes us uncomfortable."                     
 
No comments:
Post a Comment